<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speaking of gross generalizations&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nine-moons.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 04:57:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth R.</title>
		<link>http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885&#038;cpage=1#comment-72731</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885#comment-72731</guid>
		<description>Just responding to the original post... I would question the advisability of using the bloggernacle population of representative of anything except the Mormon blogging population.

Bloggers are, almost by definition, more narcissistic and self-important than the general population at large. We also tend to deal with a lot more shoot-from-the-hip incivility and time constraints mean we have to also shoot from the hip in our responses. Incivility is to be expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just responding to the original post&#8230; I would question the advisability of using the bloggernacle population of representative of anything except the Mormon blogging population.</p>
<p>Bloggers are, almost by definition, more narcissistic and self-important than the general population at large. We also tend to deal with a lot more shoot-from-the-hip incivility and time constraints mean we have to also shoot from the hip in our responses. Incivility is to be expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Reece-Lairson</title>
		<link>http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885&#038;cpage=1#comment-72507</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Reece-Lairson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 05:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885#comment-72507</guid>
		<description>My ex was in the USMC, so I have been in wards on both coasts. Humans go to church  both places! I have met ward members with sticky fingers, fanatical members, lax members, lovers of Christ, lovers of the laws and commandments, and I myself have been a pain of different kinds to different people, but I have learned a lot from just about everybody-isn&#039;t learning what the church is all about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My ex was in the USMC, so I have been in wards on both coasts. Humans go to church  both places! I have met ward members with sticky fingers, fanatical members, lax members, lovers of Christ, lovers of the laws and commandments, and I myself have been a pain of different kinds to different people, but I have learned a lot from just about everybody-isn&#8217;t learning what the church is all about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885&#038;cpage=1#comment-72451</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885#comment-72451</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mo:) Like you said about anonymity of the internet but I also think that even if we met everyone on the Bloggernacle, they&#039;re a quite different breed as a whole from those who are not on the &#039;nacle as a whole.

Basically, we&#039;re all a bunch of weirdos, but I&#039;m totally fine with that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mo:) Like you said about anonymity of the internet but I also think that even if we met everyone on the Bloggernacle, they&#8217;re a quite different breed as a whole from those who are not on the &#8216;nacle as a whole.</p>
<p>Basically, we&#8217;re all a bunch of weirdos, but I&#8217;m totally fine with that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mo mommy</title>
		<link>http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885&#038;cpage=1#comment-72442</link>
		<dc:creator>mo mommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885#comment-72442</guid>
		<description>Bret, 
I was hoping someone would recognize the absurdity and humor with which I chose that example. But really, all the things people say freely when hiding behind internet anonymity are the things they likely share surreptitiously in real life. 
McQ,
Like I once said to a friend &quot;I believe in Jesus Christ. I believe He has saved us, so it&#039;s not your job or mine to save anybody else, get off my back&quot;. Motes and beams baby, motes and beams. Thanks for saying it like a grown up and without the use of the word &quot;baby&quot;.
All we need is love, da dadada duh. All we need is love, da dadada duh. All we need is love love, love is all we need... 

Many of the things which lead people to make comments are so purely subjective that it would be hard to claim them as &quot;Gospel&quot;. Just because you don&#039;t like the way someone dresses doesn&#039;t make it irreverent or unrighteous. If things like tattoos and piercing don&#039;t automatically bar someone from the temple then how can we automatically presume to know the state of their souls based on those things? Just a couple obvious examples of where judging gray areas with one&#039;s own black and white view can be dangerous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bret,<br />
I was hoping someone would recognize the absurdity and humor with which I chose that example. But really, all the things people say freely when hiding behind internet anonymity are the things they likely share surreptitiously in real life.<br />
McQ,<br />
Like I once said to a friend &#8220;I believe in Jesus Christ. I believe He has saved us, so it&#8217;s not your job or mine to save anybody else, get off my back&#8221;. Motes and beams baby, motes and beams. Thanks for saying it like a grown up and without the use of the word &#8220;baby&#8221;.<br />
All we need is love, da dadada duh. All we need is love, da dadada duh. All we need is love love, love is all we need&#8230; </p>
<p>Many of the things which lead people to make comments are so purely subjective that it would be hard to claim them as &#8220;Gospel&#8221;. Just because you don&#8217;t like the way someone dresses doesn&#8217;t make it irreverent or unrighteous. If things like tattoos and piercing don&#8217;t automatically bar someone from the temple then how can we automatically presume to know the state of their souls based on those things? Just a couple obvious examples of where judging gray areas with one&#8217;s own black and white view can be dangerous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCQ</title>
		<link>http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885&#038;cpage=1#comment-72435</link>
		<dc:creator>MCQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885#comment-72435</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If we are not to call each other to reprentance, then what are our obligations to each other to help purify the membership? Should we turn our backs to the sins of others? What good would that be other than allow satan and his influence free reign? The gospel stands for things or it doesn’t.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is a very telling quote from you Jetboy and just as wrong-headed as it is possible to be.

You do not have a responsibility to purify the membership.  That is not your job.  What gave you that idea in the first place?  I have never heard that taught in our church.  Ever.

This does not mean that you turn your back on the sins of others, or that you give satan and his influence free reign.  The way you influence others is by love and example, not condemnation.  The way you fight satan is through prayer, repentance and personal righteousness.  Speaking of which, whatever happened to biting your tongue and worrying about your own sins when tempted to correct others?  Does that sound at all familiar to you?  It&#039;s what Christ asked of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If we are not to call each other to reprentance, then what are our obligations to each other to help purify the membership? Should we turn our backs to the sins of others? What good would that be other than allow satan and his influence free reign? The gospel stands for things or it doesn’t.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a very telling quote from you Jetboy and just as wrong-headed as it is possible to be.</p>
<p>You do not have a responsibility to purify the membership.  That is not your job.  What gave you that idea in the first place?  I have never heard that taught in our church.  Ever.</p>
<p>This does not mean that you turn your back on the sins of others, or that you give satan and his influence free reign.  The way you influence others is by love and example, not condemnation.  The way you fight satan is through prayer, repentance and personal righteousness.  Speaking of which, whatever happened to biting your tongue and worrying about your own sins when tempted to correct others?  Does that sound at all familiar to you?  It&#8217;s what Christ asked of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885&#038;cpage=1#comment-72433</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885#comment-72433</guid>
		<description>Just a side note-judgment here. I think taking the Mormon Bloggernacle as a microcosm of the Church is a stretch at best. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a side note-judgment here. I think taking the Mormon Bloggernacle as a microcosm of the Church is a stretch at best. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Right Trousers</title>
		<link>http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885&#038;cpage=1#comment-72430</link>
		<dc:creator>The Right Trousers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885#comment-72430</guid>
		<description>First, this has been talked about already, but I want to reiterate: it&#039;s absolutely critical to empathize with the judgmental ones who are giving offense. This puts you in a position to deal with it without being bogged down in your own pain. You can reason about &quot;us&quot; instead of &quot;me, hurt&quot; and &quot;that inexplicable other&quot;. It&#039;s hard.

#10: &quot;It’s compelling to judge others because it acts like a sonar ping to our own positions.&quot;

Well-stated. Saints in general seem overly concerned with how we&#039;ll be judged. We tend to settle on heuristics for ourselves, which often include comparison to others, and then apply them broadly. Hope - realistic anticipation of our own final salvation - is the antidote. With this, we stop judgment altogether, of ourselves and others. There&#039;s simply no need after discovering that the best Judge is infinitely more merciful than we are.

(BTW #8, hope, not rejecting &quot;appearance sins&quot; altogether, is IMO the best way to deal with those impossible tasks.)

We tend to skip from faith straight to charity. Or we try to, and fail miserably. Charity is really hard to have when doing all this judging stuff. Yet there are plenty who think the best way to help someone develop Christlike attributes is to hold salvation in front of them like a carrot, withholding it until they meet a minimum standard of righteousness. Hope doesn&#039;t fit in that framework, since you only develop hope after you learn you&#039;ve been saved. Besides that, it&#039;s not how the gospel works.

I have some religious envy of Protestant Christianity over this, because they seem to understand hope better than we do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, this has been talked about already, but I want to reiterate: it&#8217;s absolutely critical to empathize with the judgmental ones who are giving offense. This puts you in a position to deal with it without being bogged down in your own pain. You can reason about &#8220;us&#8221; instead of &#8220;me, hurt&#8221; and &#8220;that inexplicable other&#8221;. It&#8217;s hard.</p>
<p>#10: &#8220;It’s compelling to judge others because it acts like a sonar ping to our own positions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well-stated. Saints in general seem overly concerned with how we&#8217;ll be judged. We tend to settle on heuristics for ourselves, which often include comparison to others, and then apply them broadly. Hope &#8211; realistic anticipation of our own final salvation &#8211; is the antidote. With this, we stop judgment altogether, of ourselves and others. There&#8217;s simply no need after discovering that the best Judge is infinitely more merciful than we are.</p>
<p>(BTW #8, hope, not rejecting &#8220;appearance sins&#8221; altogether, is IMO the best way to deal with those impossible tasks.)</p>
<p>We tend to skip from faith straight to charity. Or we try to, and fail miserably. Charity is really hard to have when doing all this judging stuff. Yet there are plenty who think the best way to help someone develop Christlike attributes is to hold salvation in front of them like a carrot, withholding it until they meet a minimum standard of righteousness. Hope doesn&#8217;t fit in that framework, since you only develop hope after you learn you&#8217;ve been saved. Besides that, it&#8217;s not how the gospel works.</p>
<p>I have some religious envy of Protestant Christianity over this, because they seem to understand hope better than we do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jetboy</title>
		<link>http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885&#038;cpage=1#comment-72423</link>
		<dc:creator>Jetboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885#comment-72423</guid>
		<description>I guess I was judged so much and harshly by the world that getting called on for any &quot;righteousness&quot; issues makes me laugh. That is where a lot of my angst and anger at unrighteousness and unfaithfulness to the LDS Church and gospel comes from. To want to cozy up to the world, especially in how we act or even dress, seems counter to what the Scriptures councel.

I believe both answers, of course, are yes and yes with caution. We should not be mean about it, but as Saints it is our responsiblity to point out the sins of the world. To me that includes making statements toward members who should understand the most. For instance, was it Nephi&#039;s place to call his brother&#039;s to repentance? Although there is that family relationship, it was the father that was in charge and Nephi shouldn&#039;t have said anything. Yet, the Book of Mormon seems to indicate it was because of his faith and obedience that he was given the authority of speaking up. I admit he is the closest example of such &quot;unauthorized&quot; calling out. His brothers definately called him self righteous.

Because of the straight forwardness of the internet I am much harsher than in real life where I am for the most part quiet. However, because the Internet is so non-private I feel it an obligation to speak up and even be mean.

If we are not to call each other to reprentance, then what are our obligations to each other to help purify the membership? Should we turn our backs to the sins of others? What good would that be other than allow satan and his influence free reign? The gospel stands for things or it doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I was judged so much and harshly by the world that getting called on for any &#8220;righteousness&#8221; issues makes me laugh. That is where a lot of my angst and anger at unrighteousness and unfaithfulness to the LDS Church and gospel comes from. To want to cozy up to the world, especially in how we act or even dress, seems counter to what the Scriptures councel.</p>
<p>I believe both answers, of course, are yes and yes with caution. We should not be mean about it, but as Saints it is our responsiblity to point out the sins of the world. To me that includes making statements toward members who should understand the most. For instance, was it Nephi&#8217;s place to call his brother&#8217;s to repentance? Although there is that family relationship, it was the father that was in charge and Nephi shouldn&#8217;t have said anything. Yet, the Book of Mormon seems to indicate it was because of his faith and obedience that he was given the authority of speaking up. I admit he is the closest example of such &#8220;unauthorized&#8221; calling out. His brothers definately called him self righteous.</p>
<p>Because of the straight forwardness of the internet I am much harsher than in real life where I am for the most part quiet. However, because the Internet is so non-private I feel it an obligation to speak up and even be mean.</p>
<p>If we are not to call each other to reprentance, then what are our obligations to each other to help purify the membership? Should we turn our backs to the sins of others? What good would that be other than allow satan and his influence free reign? The gospel stands for things or it doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCQ</title>
		<link>http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885&#038;cpage=1#comment-72392</link>
		<dc:creator>MCQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885#comment-72392</guid>
		<description>Is there really any such thing as &quot;righteous judgment&quot; when we&#039;re talking about other people?  My guess is no.  

In other words, Jettboy, the answers to your questions are no and no.  You are never right to condemn others and it is never within your authority to call someone else to repentance, unless of course you happen to be that person&#039;s bishop.  And even then you better make absolutely certain you are following the spirit, because most bisops I have known do not operate that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there really any such thing as &#8220;righteous judgment&#8221; when we&#8217;re talking about other people?  My guess is no.  </p>
<p>In other words, Jettboy, the answers to your questions are no and no.  You are never right to condemn others and it is never within your authority to call someone else to repentance, unless of course you happen to be that person&#8217;s bishop.  And even then you better make absolutely certain you are following the spirit, because most bisops I have known do not operate that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mommom</title>
		<link>http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885&#038;cpage=1#comment-72383</link>
		<dc:creator>Mommom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nine-moons.com/?p=885#comment-72383</guid>
		<description>Count me in as someone who was on the receiving end of some pretty harsh treatment.  Interestly enough I found out later it was because I was the dreaded &quot;Goody-2-shoes&quot; Kind of crazy.  Members of the church didn&#039;t want to hang around with me because, Huh What?!  Talk about doing a number on your head.

I think over the years one thing has become clear.  When people need to feel superior, it really doesn&#039;t matter the reason - they&#039;ll latch on to whatever they can.  And if they can get others to listen - even better.  So first comes pride - then gossip.  They&#039;re both horrible.  

It&#039;s also tricky now that I&#039;m a mom of teenagers.  How to help my children NOT be that way, but yet make right choices - because sometimes you can&#039;t always simply NOT be friends with someone - sometimes that&#039;s not the best way.  They just might turn out to be your best friend in spite of the differences of opinion.  But, to know that no matter what choices are being made around them they need to choose the right because of who they are.  How to teach them when is the time to say something (and thus talk about the gospel) and when it&#039;s just good to be a good example.  And help them love and respect everyone around them whether they agree or disagree because of who they are.   And sometimes when it&#039;s time to actually say - you know, I know this is right, you may make your choice, but this is what I know.  And yes, I&#039;ve seen a rare occassion when I was proud of my children for drawing the courage to take a stance.  I will admit though, those times it usually involved a lack of respect that was being exhibited by others or something harmful.    

All of this is REALLY tricky and makes for lots of long, interesting discussions with my teenagers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Count me in as someone who was on the receiving end of some pretty harsh treatment.  Interestly enough I found out later it was because I was the dreaded &#8220;Goody-2-shoes&#8221; Kind of crazy.  Members of the church didn&#8217;t want to hang around with me because, Huh What?!  Talk about doing a number on your head.</p>
<p>I think over the years one thing has become clear.  When people need to feel superior, it really doesn&#8217;t matter the reason &#8211; they&#8217;ll latch on to whatever they can.  And if they can get others to listen &#8211; even better.  So first comes pride &#8211; then gossip.  They&#8217;re both horrible.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also tricky now that I&#8217;m a mom of teenagers.  How to help my children NOT be that way, but yet make right choices &#8211; because sometimes you can&#8217;t always simply NOT be friends with someone &#8211; sometimes that&#8217;s not the best way.  They just might turn out to be your best friend in spite of the differences of opinion.  But, to know that no matter what choices are being made around them they need to choose the right because of who they are.  How to teach them when is the time to say something (and thus talk about the gospel) and when it&#8217;s just good to be a good example.  And help them love and respect everyone around them whether they agree or disagree because of who they are.   And sometimes when it&#8217;s time to actually say &#8211; you know, I know this is right, you may make your choice, but this is what I know.  And yes, I&#8217;ve seen a rare occassion when I was proud of my children for drawing the courage to take a stance.  I will admit though, those times it usually involved a lack of respect that was being exhibited by others or something harmful.    </p>
<p>All of this is REALLY tricky and makes for lots of long, interesting discussions with my teenagers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
